Nanotech has been weaponized.
Here’s what most people are missing.
You cannot see most nanoparticles with a microscope. Nanoparticles are orders of magnitude smaller than what visible-light optics can resolve. To image them you need electron microscopy or other specialized instruments and that means many of the images you have probably seen that say are nanotech particles are probably inaccurate.
Cheap images, misread micrographs, and bad procedures create a perfect storm for fear. Some researchers and commentators have overstated findings, and those exaggerations have been weaponized to spread fear about vaccines, materials, and health risks without rigorous evidence.
This week we are talking about nanotech on the True Health Report. In this groundbreaking episode I was joined by a panel of experts — Dr. Marizelle Arce, Josh & Adam Bigelsen & Dr. Ana Maria Oliva — to expose the myths and reveal what’s really happening when you look at living blood under the microscope.
Together, we dismantle the false claims about nanomachines, hydrogels, and circuitry in the blood, and put these images into their true biological context.
We discuss:
• Why claims of “nanobots in the blood” are scientifically impossible
• The difference between live blood analysis and conventional hematology
• How artifacts, crystals, and even salt patterns are misinterpreted as “nanotech”
• Why you cannot identify a substance’s composition from an image alone
• The dangers of fear-based interpretations that push unnecessary (and harmful) treatments
• What microzymas, somatids, and pleomorphic forms really reveal about the body
• How to think critically about microscopy, reproducibility, and scientific context
• Why fear weakens healing (and how understanding strengthens it)
This episode gives you clarity, evidence, and perspective that cut through fear, so you can focus on truth, not terror.
Listen to the entire episode wherever you get your podcasts
source