Survey Says: Science Is Inconclusive.
When it comes to methylene blue—and many other so-called miracle compounds—the hard truth is this: the science doesn’t back the hype.
Dig into the clinical research and you’ll find a consistent pattern. Small sample sizes. Inconclusive outcomes.
Minimal real-world impact. Despite being labeled a neuroprotective antioxidant and mitochondrial enhancer, there is a lack of strong, peer-reviewed evidence supporting methylene blue’s long-term efficacy or safety.
So why are people rushing to try it?
Like many health trends before it, methylene blue has become popular thanks to buzzwords, influencers, and anecdotal claims—not because of rigorous scientific validation. Originally developed in the 19th century as a textile dye, it later found a role in medicine, but not without controversy or risk.
The reality is simple: we need to stop equating trendiness with truth. Just because something is gaining popularity doesn’t mean it’s safe or effective.
Before trying any new compound, especially one with limited research and potential side effects, ask the deeper questions. Where is the data? Who funded the studies? What outcomes are actually being measured?
Don’t believe the hype. Seek the evidence.
This week on The True Health Report, we’re breaking down the real science behind methylene blue—and why the risks might outweigh the benefits.
source