We Are Free – But for How Long? : Your Own World USA

God be praised; we are winning this decisive battle for freedom but have yet to win all future wars. Heaven appreciates our prayers, but humanity has been here before and lost. This much we will soon learn.

So, if prayers alone are not enough to win all future wars, what more is needed?  Healthy, happy, flourishing families.  Only in this way can humanity achieve the critical mass of good souls necessary to crush any future resurgence of evil, and it is a matter of evolution.

When we hear the phrase “survival of the fittest,” it’s natural to presume that it is about our physique.  Nothing could be further from the truth.

The truth is, “survival of the fittest” describes what species must do to survive, and it comes down to three things.  Procreation is the first, and it’s the biggie.  Then, there are survival and adaptation.

In America today, we’re failing on all three counts by intention, thus raising an ominous prospect.  Unless we address this forthrightly, a resurgence of evil will eventually happen, and humanity will lose its hard-fought gains with a short-lived sense of freedom.

So, what will turn this around, and who will bear the burden for this essential mission?  That’s the whole point of this article, and we’ll hit all the bases.

Marriage in America is Transactional

In America, marriage is no longer a sacred institution.  It is a transaction, and this is sad.  When I was a lad, it was a time when American women were among the most desirable in the world, and one of the worst things anyone could say about you was that you were a homewrecker.

Today, American women have become the least desirable, and our systems of law, governance, and media are brutally effective homewrecking machines, and the numbers do not lie.

After the feminist movement and the introduction of the pill, there was a sharp increase in the fertility rate. That trend reversed in 1969 with the signing of the Family Law Act, which introduced no-fault divorce under Governor Ronald Reagan in California.

Then, in 1973, the downward trend in the fertility rate became a catastrophic plunge with Roe v. Wade. This shift has occurred worldwide, with the steepest decline in industrial nations like the United States. As of 2023, the birth rate among natural-born American women stands at 1.6, significantly lower than the 2.1 needed to maintain a stable population.

This is unstainable, and if the American family dies, the nation dies, and the numbers tell us that we’ve got one foot in the grave.  Consequently, we’ll fail if we keep framing this conversation in political, sociological, and ideological terms.

Instead, we need outcome-driven, common-sense solutions. For this, it’s as easy as 1-2-3. First, we isolate the cause of failure. Then, as a nation, we need to decide who will fix this and how we back their hand.  First, let’s establish our goal.

The goal is to restore marriage as a sacred institution in America and ensure our sustained ability to prevent a future resurgence of evil.  In other words, only with families can we win all future wars.  So, what is the evil seed of our problems?

The Evil Seed

The evil seed of our problems was planted in December 1917, shortly after the Bolshevik Revolution; Lenin signed revolutionary decrees on marriage and divorce that fundamentally transformed family law in the Soviet Union.

These changes introduced the world’s first no-fault divorce system, allowing marriage dissolution through a simple registration process without requiring proof of wrongdoing.  As usual, we can thank goddamn communists for our social ills.  It is so predictable, and fixing it will be a dirty job.  This brings us to who the nation needs to meet this challenge.  The long answer is good, middle-class men.  The short answer is builders.  Say what?

For this conversation, let’s assume three types of people who marry, for both men and women: Builders, slackers, and takers.

Slackers have no real ambition and often become sea anchors for builders-it’s a matter of drag.  But slackers can be happy with slackers.

Takers are driven by their appetites, desires, and emotions. They’ll take anything that isn’t nailed to the floor and often return with a pry bar to get the rest. They will always be sea mines for builders.

The bottom line for slackers and takers is simple.  Humanity needs a few good builders to keep its hard-won freedom, and you ain’t it so hit the showers and no whining.  You’re not in the game.  Never were. Now, let’s talk about builders.

Builders

In this conversation, builders are men and women who want to build things with a lifetime partner—a life, a family, a business, a legacy. With that, let’s discuss them as men and women.  Men first.

When you read the ancient wisdom texts, you learn that women did not create the institution of marriage. It was created by good men for the women they love. A good example can be found in The Kolbrin Bible, which was penned some 3,600 years ago.

The Kolbrin Bible: 21st Century Master Edition
Kolbrin.com, Book of Scrolls 27:11

Heaven daily goes about the task of sustaining Earth; she is never neglected. Therefore, take an example from the greater sphere of life; sustain and cherish your wife, that she never be neglected. He who sows seeds of discontent before his hearth reaps a full harvest of misery. Thus, it is written by the Wise One in olden times; even so, it is now and will always be.

Today, we say it in fewer words.  Happy wife, happy life.  That brings us to the ladies.  First and second ladies, that is.  Both are very successful, as are their husbands.

Melania Trump

Born Melanija Knavs on April 26, 1970, in Slovenia, is currently serving as First Lady of the United States as the wife of Donald J. Trump, the 45th and 47th President.  Patriots love her because she is a fighter.

Historically speaking, most first ladies tend to stay in the background.  Not Melania.  She stands with her husband in the crosshairs, and her wardrobe makes her a walking Q comm metaphor with panache.

Usha Vance

Usha Vance is the wife of Vice-Presient JD Vance.  She is making history as the first Indian American and Hindu second lady of the United States.

Born to Indian immigrant parents in San Diego, California, she grew up in a middle-class community. She completed her BA in History at Yale University and earned a Master of Philosophy degree at the University of Cambridge as a Gates Scholar.

Her upbringing in a family of accomplished professionals has contributed to her pursuit of academic and professional excellence.

What do both women share in common?  Both were raised in a strong culture of traditional marriage and personal excellence.

The bottom line is this: Vance has an Indian wife, and Trump has an Eastern European wife.  Congratulations to both for marrying a woman from a culture that values and supports traditional marriage.

In American culture, everything is transactional, and for most good American men, most American women are uninterested, unhappy, unforgiving, and unreliable. That’s just how it is, which is why so many men in America have abandoned the dating scene and why others who want to build a life travel overseas for traditional brides.   It’s not a seller’s market anymore.

More to the point, President Trump understands our birthrate fertility crisis very well, and that is why he proposed making vitro fertilization treatments a covered expense.

NPR, August 30, 2024
Trump says he’ll support free IVF treatments in a second term

Former President Donald Trump said Thursday that if he’s elected again, his administration would fund in vitro fertilization treatments.

“I was always for IVF. Right from the beginning, as soon as we heard about it,” the Republican nominee said in an interview with NBC News in Michigan.

Trump told NBC he’d support public funding for in vitro fertilization, or a mandate requiring insurance companies to cover it. He reiterated the proposal during a town hall in La Crosse, Wisc. Thursday evening, but he did not provide any details on how the plan would work.

The procedure to treat infertility can cost tens of thousands of dollars.

“We’re doing this because we just think it’s great. And we need great children, beautiful children in our country, we actually need them,” Trump told NBC.

He’s right about that.  But is it possible that men going overseas for traditional wives and making in vitro a mandatory healthcare benefit will generate a strong enough family base to prevent a future resurgence of evil?  No.

While this will primarily serve the upper classes, it does nothing to make marriage with American women safe for middle-class men who want to start families but cannot afford the inevitable lawfare and the heartbreak of automatically losing their children along with everything else.

Therefore, the message for our President and Vice President is congratulations on marrying a woman from a culture that values and supports traditional marriage, but let’s be honest. If you want more babies in America, focus on making marriage safe for middle-class men—the good ones, the builders.  This takes us back to the evil seed.

For a Few Good Men

Since Lenin, no-fault divorce has been the cornerstone of an extensive agenda to divide the sexes, destroy families, and cripple good men.  Therefore, the best first step in fixing what’s wrong with divorce is to eliminate the term from American jurisprudence.

Today, divorce and dissolution are two distinct legal processes for ending a marriage, with key differences in their approaches and requirements.

With dissolution, there is minimal court involvement, with the court typically only reviewing the final agreement. Mutual cooperation and a desire for a faster, less expensive process exist.

With Divorce: More extensive court involvement, especially when spouses disagree on terms. Here is where lunch box Joe gets his clock cleaned, for life, in a legal feeding frenzy.

The solution.  In the case of couples without children, replace divorce with binding arbitration.  This way, the court can ask to show cause, dismiss the filing, or refer it to binding arbitration.

In the case of couples with children, the historical approach has always been to treat the children as chattels to argue over, and the result is invariably a bad outcome for the children.

The family court presumption has always been that children are better off with their mothers in America.  However, the statistics clearly show that the children of single male parents have much better lifetime outcomes than the children of single male parents.

The point here is that it is time to stop arguing with an automatic family trust, similar to a blind trust.

A blind trust is a specialized legal arrangement in which the trustor (the person creating the trust) transfers assets to a trustee who manages them with complete independence, while the trustor and beneficiaries remain unaware of how the assets are managed.

When either parent files for dissolution and children are involved, both parents become Grantor, establish the trust, and transfer all marital assets to it.  The children are the beneficiaries of the trust.

Making this work requires a Trustee to administer the trust on behalf of the beneficiaries, the children. If the parents cannot agree on a mutually acceptable Trustee, the court can appoint one.

The sole criterion for the court is the children’s outcome, and the parents’ rights are secondary.  Therefore, custody goes to the parent who can provide the best outcome for the children without prejudice.  This way, not one, but both parents walk out with nothing more than the shirts on their backs.

In other words, removing the word divorce from the national lexicon is no longer about what is fair for the parents.  It’s about protecting children from bad outcomes; only a poor parent could object to this.

This is just one way to approach the problem and serves as a reference for a larger question: How do we get the good guys who’ve sidelined themselves back into the dating game when it comes to starting families?

For starters, a living wage to support a family and the peace of mind of knowing that you’re not communist cannon fodder.  Nature and the calendar will take care of the rest.

It’s doable in some form.

Tags: family, social programming, survival, Survivalism

Category: Humanity