You thought they found the spike protein, didn’t you?
Here’s what actually went down with that widespread report out of Australia.
Post hoc modification.
This occurs when what is visualized in research is not what’s expected, so additional processes are used to make it look the way it’s “supposed” to look. In the case of the spike protein with SARS‑CoV‑2, a research paper out of Australia conducted cell culture simulations and created images they determined were SARS‑CoV‑2 particles—but there was just one problem: they didn’t contain the spikes. So, they mixed the samples with digestive enzymes to get the desired outcome.
The “spikes” were not visible on the original sample, so they modified it to satisfy their narrative.
Scientists want their research to be read and supported, so they have to make it worthwhile.
You have to be so careful when you look at scientific research because often, it’s manipulated and changed to satisfy their needs.
This is a clip from my recent True Health Report Podcast, where I debunk Microscopy Myths.
Watch the complete episode on my main channel.
source